Jump to content

Talk:SRE/Clinic Duty

From Wikitech
(Redirected from Talk:RT Triage Duty)
Latest comment: 2 years ago by BCornwall in topic Proposal to move the schedule to a subpage
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Goals

Moving Goals here from Interrupts Rotation:

Goals:

  • To be more responsive to Engineering's needs
  • To not have RT be a black hole
  • Improve communication about when a ticket can realistically be completed by
  • Reduce wait time on tickets so that we're less likely to a blocker, especially on relatively simple tickets
  • Make sure that RT tickets have all of the information required for someone in ops to complete them

I think these are better articulated in the RT Triage Duty page itself, but I'm preserving the list here in case I'm wrong. sumanah (talk) 02:56, 20 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notes from previous rotators

(Moving from Interrupts Rotation.)

Notes from previous rotators:

  • Peter Youngmeister:
    • Rt is relatively easy to triage. Emails to Ops@ are a bit more difficult, because they really are to the whole team.
    • Prioritizing things is challenging. Everythings seems important. I think that writing up some kind of guidelines for this as a team would be really helpful.
    • Daniel is amazing at closing out tickets.
    • Don't be on rotation when traveling... It requires a lot of attention.

sumanah (talk) 02:57, 20 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

don't refer to step #s on another page and expect them to remain static

The note on creating private lists refers to "step 7" but the step #s are dynamically generated (<ol>) so which one is 7 can change over time. --jeremyb (talk) 07:58, 9 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposal to move the schedule to a subpage

The list is only going to grow larger as time goes on and gets in the way of the information in the article. Thoughts? --BCornwall (talk) 22:26, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Yes Done Discussed with User:Jbond and got concensus. --BCornwall (talk) 16:57, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply